Demonstrations
Nine demonstrations, one fictional office.
All demonstration data is fictional. Nothing shown here is connected to a real office, client or file, and no output is legally valid.
Choose a demonstration
Open any of the nine
Demo A
Maturity: PrototypeMatter workspace
One fictional property matter: reference, type, responsible professional, clients, counterparties, status, dates, tasks, documents, communications, fees, outstanding actions and activity history.
A professional should recognise the operational picture of a file at a glance.
- Problem
- The state of a file is spread across email, folders and memory.
- For
- Notaries, lawyers, paralegals
- Data
- One fictional property matter
- Could connect
- Document storage, email, calendar (potential)
- Limitations
- Read-only; nothing is saved.
Demo B
Maturity: PrototypeDocument workflow
Nine stages from matter opening to archival. Inspect each stage to see who acts, what information is needed, what is waiting, what changed and where a human must approve.
The demonstration does not create legally valid documents.
- Problem
- It is unclear who acts next and where approval is needed.
- For
- Professionals and assistants
- Data
- Nine fictional workflow stages
- Could connect
- Document storage (potential)
- Limitations
- Creates no legally valid document.
Demo C
Maturity: PrototypeOffice operations — needs attention
Deadlines, matters waiting on clients, documents awaiting review, incomplete records, unsigned documents, billing items and workload by professional — each inspectable with a stated reason.
Decision support, not automated legal decision-making.
- Problem
- What needs attention today is not visible in one place.
- For
- Office managers, partners
- Data
- Synthetic office figures and items
- Could connect
- Office software, calendar (potential)
- Limitations
- Decision support only; counts are invented.
Demo D
Maturity: PrototypeDocument intelligence
A fictional specimen document with illustrative extracted fields, dates, parties, obligations, gaps, version comparison, clause locations and section summaries.
Every result is assistance only. Professional review required.
- Problem
- Reading long documents for dates, parties and gaps is slow.
- For
- Professionals reviewing documents
- Data
- One fictional lease specimen
- Could connect
- Document storage (potential)
- Limitations
- Assistance only. Professional review required.
Demo E
Maturity: PrototypeClient & matter relationships
Fictional people, organisations and related parties recorded once and linked across matters over several years — with documents, appointments, communications, fees and activity per client.
A data model demonstration, not production CRM software.
- Problem
- The same client is re-entered for every new matter.
- For
- Whole office
- Data
- 11 people, 5 organisations, 12 matters (fictional)
- Could connect
- Registries, email (potential)
- Limitations
- Not production CRM software.
Demo F
Maturity: PrototypeAppointments & deadlines
Appointments, matter dates, internal and review deadlines, outstanding client information and follow-ups — grouped by overdue, today, this week and upcoming.
No external calendar is connected.
- Problem
- Appointments and deadlines live in separate places.
- For
- Professionals and assistants
- Data
- Fictional appointments and tasks
- Could connect
- Microsoft 365 / calendar (potential)
- Limitations
- No calendar is connected.
Demo G
Maturity: PrototypeSignature / execution register
Fictional documents from draft to archive, with required signatories, appointment, outstanding action, professional-control checkpoint and history.
Workflow tracking only. No signature is created or simulated.
- Problem
- Tracking which document awaits which signature is manual.
- For
- Notaries and assistants
- Data
- Fictional documents and signatories
- Could connect
- Electronic signature (potential)
- Limitations
- Tracking only; no signature is created.
Demo H
Maturity: PrototypeFees & billing workspace
Time-based, fixed, administrative and disbursement items, a matter-level summary, and a draft invoice prepared from selected items for professional approval.
Not an accounting system. Not a legally authoritative fee calculator.
- Problem
- Fee items are gathered by hand before invoicing.
- For
- Professionals, accounts staff
- Data
- Fictional fee items and invoices
- Could connect
- Accounting software (potential)
- Limitations
- Not an accounting system or tariff calculator.
Demo I
Maturity: PrototypeKnowledge & precedents
A fictional precedent library with filters, ownership, review dates, related matters, version history and a version comparison.
Highlights changes; never says which version is legally correct.
- Problem
- The office's own precedents are hard to find and compare.
- For
- Professionals
- Data
- Nine fictional precedents
- Could connect
- Document storage (potential)
- Limitations
- Never says which version is legally correct.